Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong stated that the company studied the possibility of incorporating banking functions that could avoid or correct the loopholes exposed in the latest failure of traditional banking, amid the crisis of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.
What did Brian Armstrong say?
Through his Twitter account, Armstrong answered the questioning of cryptocurrency insurance firm Evertas’ chief strategy officer, Ryan Lackey, who asked him whether the exchange had considered offering neo banking services to high-net-worth individuals and businesses.
“It’s definitely something we’ve thought about. We need some more features, such as outbound transfers, multi-user support, etc. Fractional reserve-free ‘banking’ definitely seems more attractive right now,” he wrote.
Definitely something we've thought about. Need a few more features like outbound wires, multi-user support etc.
Non-fractional reserve "banking" is definitely looking more attractive right now.
What are the key features you'd want?
— Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) March 13, 2023
State regulators shut down Signature Bank on Sunday, in what was the third-largest failure in U.S. banking history. It came two days after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), a collapse that left billions of dollars in deposits stranded.
Signature provided banking services to real estate companies, law firms, and cryptocurrency companies. In fact, about 30% of the bank’s deposits came from the crypto ecosystem.
Coinbase was one of those affected by this closure. The exchange confirmed that it had about $240 million in the financial institution, although it expects to recover all its money.
All client cash at banks continues to be protected by FDIC pass-through insurance. Due to FDIC's hold on Signature’s transactions, we’re currently facilitating all client cash transactions with other banking partners.
— Coinbase 🛡️ (@coinbase) March 12, 2023
This financial institution’s connection to the cryptocurrency world was something it had in common with the also collapsed SVB.
Companies such as Circle, issuer of the second largest stablecoins in the market (USDC), were victims of the closure of Silicon Valley Bank.
The company held $3.3 billion of its $40 billion USDC reserves in the collapsed bank, according to a statement issued by the firm on Friday.
The implosion of both financial institutions raised concerns within the cryptocurrency industry about the financial stability of its banking partners.
What does this mean for the cryptocurrency industry?
The possibility of Coinbase becoming a bank could have significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry as a whole. If Coinbase were to offer neo banking services, it could provide a much-needed alternative to traditional banking for high-net-worth individuals and businesses.
This could potentially lead to greater adoption of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, as more people would have access to banking services tailored to their needs.
At the same time, the failures of Signature Bank and Silicon Valley Bank highlight the need for greater financial stability within the cryptocurrency industry.
As more companies enter the space, it will become increasingly important for them to choose banking partners that are reliable and stable.
Follow us on our social networks and keep up with everything in the Metaverse!
Twitter Linkedin Facebook Telegram Instagram Google News
